From a 16-person incubator to a 150+ person global practice.
Growth looked like a demand problem. It was an operating-model problem.
The natural read was to win more programs and hire behind them. Demand was there. But delivery quality depended on a handful of people, and nothing about the offer, the delivery model or the go-to-market was packaged. Every new program started close to scratch.
The research partnership gave the work its depth, but it wasn't built into the offer, so it didn't travel with the practice as it grew. Scaling headcount on that base would have scaled the variance, not the results.
A packaged offer and delivery model, with teams scaled behind what was proven.
- MapWe mapped how programs were actually sold, staffed and delivered across the early engagements, and where results depended on specific people rather than on the model.
- AssessThe constraint was packaging: offer, delivery and teaming weren't codified, so growth would have multiplied inconsistency.
- DecidePackage the offer and the delivery model, stand up a go-to-market model by sector, and scale teams behind proven offerings rather than ahead of them.
- ExecuteRan the program as COO: secured budgets, targeted the go-to-market, teamed practice areas globally, and ran quarterly release cycles on the offer. Practice leaders owned the client relationships.
A practice, not a program.
The headcount and revenue figures describe the practice as a whole, which many people built. The program's contribution was the operating model underneath: what made each step of growth repeatable instead of heroic.
What carried forward into Zero Fog's work today
Scaling behind proof rather than ahead of it. Every recommendation now carries the evidence that the step before it worked.
Facing a similar decision?
Zero Fog Advisory Group · quarterly execution cycles · founder-led